Albuquerque Urbanist Blog With a YIMBY-Bent

An Urbanist Diary in Albuquerque

CategorIes:

By

·

5–8 minutes

Notes from a car-free life in the high desert, between bus stops, taquerias, and a future worth fighting for.


Leaving and Returning

Leaving Albuquerque provides you with a lot of insight into what it is like to live in a bigger city. The subway is a 10 minute walk away, and the supermarket, sandwich shop, and bar are right next to it. A stop away is work, and a few stops beyond that is Downtown, where you can bump into friends, shop, dance, and run into your crush at 1am, drunk, with tzatziki sauce dripping down your shirt.

Moving back to Albuquerque—unaware that a global pandemic was about to sweep through society and upend everything, especially urban life—offered a chance to rethink what it means to live that life in the Southwest. The southwest isn’t known for its urbanism, after all. When you tell people where you are from, they ask if it’s really as crazy as in Breaking Bad, or share stories about the crystals they bought during a life-changing roadtrip through Santa Fe and Abiquiu.

But, ART had been approved and construction updates trickled through Facebook and Twitter feeds, and knowing it would be there made the idea of the Southwest appealing again. Previously, living in Albuquerque meant car maintenance, commutes, and long walks in the sun (or wind), so maybe things would be different, now. After all, it was also showing up on bike-friendly lists, and that’s a good sign, right?

ART recently has reached 10,000,000 rides and the backlash has largely died down (even if some local politicians are trying to bring it back as a culture war issue for a cynical mayoral campaign), and it brings reflection on what urbanism is like here. Has it become possible? It might not be as easy as in those big East Coast Cities (or, gasp, Europe), but it is possible. And it isn’t just bloggers on the internet thinking about this, popular Youtuber CityNerd has not only featured Albuquerque in a few of his urbanist videos, he also lived here and advocated for Albuquerque’s nascent emergence as an urbanist destination. ART, then, is responsible for at least two urbanists moving to or back to Albuquerque. So, it is possible to live an urbanist life here, if sometimes frustrating.

Everyone drives in Albuquerque

If you don’t use a car, or have one, people will be shocked by how you get around. “How did you get to the office today?”—”Oh my god, do you need a ride home?”—”I could never take the bus, I have an anxiety disorder.”

Doesn’t your anxiety disorder also flare up on I-25 when you have to slam on the brakes at 80mph?

But you also find out that, like you, other people don’t drive. Like you, they shop, eat at restaurants, and lose a potential mortgage to avocado toast and artisanal pancakes at The Grove. You might recognize the Lyft driver that takes you home from the bar because the ART stops at 11:00pm on weekends. And you start to recognize the regulars on your bus routes. On the early bus, you might see the small group of nurses that always sit together on the 11, heading to UNMH. If you ride later and take the ART, you might spot the teaching assistant from the university who once dropped their notes all over the floor. You helped them pick everything up. You don’t talk, but you recognize each other now. A quiet nod, a friendly smile. Fellow bus riders in a city where everyone drives and no one takes the bus.

(Some) people walk in Albuquerque

The best places to walk and the best buildings to look at in Albuquerque are generally in the places where your coworkers will tell you to “never go.” Walking from Barelas to Downtown, the smaller buildings with hand-painted murals, the shops, the small restaurants, all provide for drops of sweet serotonin. Getting to Central, the vestiges of what Albuquerque once was stand out. My favorites change weekly. Lately, i’ve been in love with the Rosenwald Building. Inhabited by a police substation and empty otherwise, waiting. Like most of Downtown, just waiting.

My least favorite buildings—and places—in Albuquerque are the places people say they like, or at least, aren’t afraid to visit. Uptown, for example. The walk along Menaul gives you the big, grey mall on one side framed by its sea of parking, and tire shops on the other, while you get to enjoy inhaling exhaust fumes. And for the coworkers who think Central, Barelas, or anything south of I-40 is dangerous? Visiting the Target can feel like a suicide mission when crossing the street. The planners of the past never really intended people to step outside of the buildings though, did they? The utopic vision of the car-centric era. Pull up, go in, and buy what the marketers tell you to. I’ll keep my Central Avenue and the people asking for a light, thank you very much.

Leaving the neighborhood

It all comes back to ART. ABQ Ride is a broken system that does miracle-level work on a shoe-string budget. Neglected by city leaders—unless they are trying to get into the headlines for cynical reasons—it… Mostly works. But ART is different. It is largely dependable, despite some quirks. It is a true BRT with dedicated lanes and platform stations. A pneumatic light rail. It’s hard not to call it excellent—and harder still not to feel like you’re carrying a cross and a sword every time you defend it against the negativity and misinformation that inevitably comes.

For urbanists and non-urbanists alike, Albuquerque shines when it comes to cuisine. ART connects to some of the best restaurants in the country—Duran’s and Farina—for example. And personal favorites, too, like El Patio, Cocina Azul, Thai II, and Pho #1 (R.I.P. May Cafe). Supposedly, we transit riders don’t contribute to the local economy. My credit card statement would disagree.

Optimism

ART remains one of the few true sources of optimism for the Albuquerque urbanist. Despite years of lawsuits, backlash, NIMBY outrage, and misinformation, it stands as proof that we can build good things—and that they can work. O-69 hopefully defanged the NIMBY machine in Albuquerque, we shall see. The coming years also show promise with momentum for zoning justice as well as ABQ Ride Forward, which might bring the rest of the ABQ Ride transit network up to a usable standard.

Despite that, it is easy to think that if Albuquerque doesn’t make more meaningful changes in the next few years, it may be time to set sail for other ports. It often feels that our councilors and mayor are more afraid of cranky busybodies in Westside neighborhood associations or bored retirees with nothing better to do than pester urban planners than it cares about brain-drain, loss of investment, and losing a generation to other, greener pastures. Still, recently, new groups have formed and changed the narrative. They have disrupted the old flow of things, the slow-drip of complacency, self-deprecation, and resistance to everything. There is hope for Albuquerque, for urbanism in the southwest, and for people to vote for environmentally friendly ways of being. It’s up to us to pushback on harmful narratives and stake our claim. Hey, it’s an election year! Let’s help the officials that placate NIMBYs pack their bags and get some new blood into government. After all, San Mateo is ready for its ART line treatment and we are tired of waiting.


Do you live car-free or car-light in ABQ and care about Urbanism? Want to share your own urbanist reflections? Send a draft to reimaginingalbuquerque@gmail.com and we may share it.

With or without attribution, up to you 😉

4 responses to “An Urbanist Diary in Albuquerque”

  1. Carlos Avatar
    Carlos

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️

    Liked by 1 person

  2. pdaviswillson Avatar
    pdaviswillson

    Hi, I am not a “cranky busybody in Westside neighborhood associations or bored retiree with nothing better to do than pester urban planners”. I am a long-time resident, small-time landlord, architect, activist and unpaid protester. The current narrative you and others espouse recalls a Field of Dreams–“Re-zone it and they will build”. ADU’s have been legal in R-1 since the 2022 IDO update. How many have been built? I think the current number is 14. O-24-69 upzoned large swaths of Albuquerque–any permits related to that yet? Let’s give the current changes a chance to work thru the system, rather than continuing to propose more amendments to our zoning code than any other municipality anywhere (the Pre-EPC Submittal for the 2025 IDO Update has 99 items on it).

    Like

    1. Reimagining Albuquerque Avatar
      Reimagining Albuquerque

      Thanks for reading — your comment reflects a common trap: assuming that just because a reform passed, the job is done. But in reality, many of the zoning changes we’ve seen so far are either too limited or too encumbered by fine print to make the impact we need.
      Take the ADU legalization, that’s a good example. Yes, it passed in 2022. But it came with a dozen Trojan Horse amendments, the result of a fraught, often hostile process dominated by loud opposition from the usual suspects: homeowner associations, neighborhood coalitions, and longtime activists who made it clear they didn’t actually want any new housing near them. They showed up at public meetings sounding alarms about “character,” “parking,” and “protecting R-1,” and City Council bent over backward to accommodate them. The result was a policy that legalized ADUs in name, but not in practice.
      Minimum lot size requirements, floor area ratio caps, rear setbacks that make corner lots nearly unworkable not to mention other lots, and the now-infamous “can’t be taller than the primary house” rule were all baked in to limit where ADUs could actually be built. In a city where many homes are single-story, that effectively bans apartments over garages which can one of the most common and practical forms of ADU housing , before they even get proposed. These aren’t technical oversights. They’re deliberate design limitations, written into the bill to satisfy groups that didn’t want ADUs at all.
      The fact that we’ve only seen 14 ADUs built under these rules isn’t a reason to “let it play out.” It’s a red flag. It proves what passed wasn’t enough. California faced the same issue, and they simplified their ADU laws. Now they lead the country (at least in that category, they have a lot of reform to do elsewhere).
      As for O-24-69, it just passed and already faces legal challenges from the same entrenched neighborhood associations that have been blocking change for decades. These aren’t good-faith appeals. They’re delay tactics dressed up in the language of process and community concern. Many of the same voices now filing lawsuits and involved to stop O-69 also spent years arguing that housing should be left to the public process. But when the public process doesn’t go their way, they run to the courts. It’s not principled. It’s protectionism. It’s a symptom of the apartheid thinking built into our zoning system in the United States. Can you really expect there to be a lot of permits filed when developers are waiting for the district court to throw it out? If anything, it’s an argument that we need to double-down on O-69.
      And it comes at a human cost. Every delay means another year of families doubling up, renters squeezed out, or young people leaving Albuquerque entirely. It means more displacement through scarcity, and fewer options for those historically shut out of homeownership. And yes we need to say it plainly: the current process rewards wealth, whiteness, and homeownership, and makes it nearly impossible for low-income residents or renters of color to shape their own neighborhoods or build capital.
      The reason Albuquerque has more zoning amendments than most cities (we can assume true for conversation) isn’t because we’re overcorrecting. It’s because we spent decades doing nothing but placating Nimbyism. The IDO was a good first step: it brought scattered, awful rules under one roof and created a foundation for change and amendments. But now it needs to be simplified. We need to make basic things like ADUs easier to build. We need to preempt the endless tangle of overlays, design mandates, and neighborhood-specific formulas that make the process unpredictable and expensive. That unpredictability is exactly what kills momentum and deters investment. Do we want ADUs? Do we want to solve homelessness? Do we want investment? Then lets make it happen and stop standing on our own feet.
      Fixing that helps create the consistency and scale we need for a real housing response. It allows both small builders and larger developers to take the risk on infill, missing middle, and walkable housing types without getting lost in a bureaucratic maze.
      Regular updates to the IDO aren’t a burden. They’re the only way to make it functional. And we can go further: much of the IDO could and should be moved into administrative processes. There’s no reason why minor site plan adjustments should require EPC review. We should let city staff do their jobs and stop letting entrenched groups in places like Taylor Ranch or the Northeast Heights hijack public meetings to block every project they don’t like (all of them).
      Thanks again for engaging. Debate is healthy. But we need to stop mistaking delay for deliberation. Delay has a cost, and too often, it’s paid by those with the least power to speak up. That’s not equity. That’s obstruction and we see the cost every time we drive down East Central.

      Like

  3. Jordon Avatar
    Jordon

    ❤ Inshallah citywide upzoning and ART expansions soon

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a reply to Carlos Cancel reply